Legal Opinion

Apodaca v. Town of Tome Land Grant

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1974No. 9824PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This appeal is taken from an order denying appellants’ motion to intervene.

We affirm.

The common lands of the Tome Land Grant were sold several years ago. The proceeds of sale constitute a substantial fund. The main case here was brought to determine the heirs of the grant. Appellants’ claim to share in the fund as heirs of the grant forms the basis for their motion to intervene.

The action was filed on August 8, 1968. Trial began on February 6, 1973. All of the appellants here filed their applications to intervene subsequent to the beginning of trial. Some of. the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Ionian Shipping Company, and Allied Chemical Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant v. British Law Insurance Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Cooper v. Albuquerque City CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Solon Ex Rel. Estate of Ponce v. WEK Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Hood Ex Rel. State Tobacco LitigationMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Burge v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Murken v. Solv-Ex Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Losey v. Norwest Bank of New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API