Legal Opinion

Holguin v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1977No. 11066PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff, David Holguin and five others (hereinafter Landowners — which shall at times refer to plaintiffs predecessors in title) brought suit against Elephant Butte Irrigation District (EBID) for a declaratory judgment to establish their water rights on land located within the geographical limits of the irrigation district. Landowners also claimed damages for failure of EBID to provide irrigation facilities and prayed for damages for improvements made by them because of alleged representations by EBID agents that their water rights would not be contested. EBID…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. United States v. RauscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hanson v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Srader v. VerantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API