Legal Opinion
Pellegrino v. Nesbit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1953No. 13220PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
' This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion for leave to intervene, subsequent to entry of final judgments in the consolidated cases, of Consolidated Engineering Corporation, v, Nesbit (Consolidated Engineering Corporation v. Colvin, and Consolidated Engineering Corporation v. Bradburn), D.C. S.D.Cal.1951, 102 F.Supp. 112, for the purpose of appealing the decision in these cases-to this court.
In October 1950 appellant, a stockholder in appellee corporation, requested the corporation to institute suit under the provisions of § 16(b)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Cerro Metal Products v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.