Legal Opinion

Flagg v. Puterbaugh

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1894No. 19270PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition in the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to the judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.—

This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of mandamas to compel the respondent to settle and certify a bill of exceptions. The petition was demurred to on various grounds. The demurrer was sustained solely on the ground that more than sixty days had elapsed since the order was made, and the petition does not show that an appeal had been taken. All other objections were expressly overruled, and leave was given to amend in order that the defect might be supplied, if the facts would warrant it.

An amended petition was filed, from which it appears that an appeal' to this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Landers v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sampson v. LaytonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Grotheer v. Meyer Rosenberg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Washington County v. Weiser National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API