Legal Opinion

Landers v. Lawler

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1890No. 13680PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate to F. W. Lawler, judge of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

An alternative writ of mandate was issued out of this court, commanding the respondent to settle, *548allow, and certify a bill of exceptions proposed on behalf of defendants in the above-entitled cause, or show cause before this court why he did not do so. The judge answers, and for cause shows that no proposed bill of exceptions has ever been presented to him for settlement and allowance.

The paper filed here, denominated a petition for the writ, upon examination appears to be an affidavit, with venue laid in the city and county of San Francisco, concluding with a prayer that a writ of mandate…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flagg v. PuterbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bell v. Fee Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API