Primm v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Shasta County. C. M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
Application for a writ of prohibition. In an action entitled Menzel v. Primm et al., pending in the superior court in and for Shasta county, an attachment was issued and levied on certain realty owned by the defendant Primm. The trial of the cause resulted in a judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of said defendant. After the judgment had been rendered and entered, the court, on motion of the plaintiff, Menzel, made an order continuing the said attachment in force upon compliance by plaintiff with the terms of said order, which terms conform to the provisions of section 946 of the Code…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bruner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Koerber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Weintraub v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.