Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Layton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1963No. 9363PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Chief Justice.

This action was commenced by appellant Dyer Sampson, as plaintiff, against respondents LePage Layton, as sheriff of the county of Cassia, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, as surety upon Mr. Lay-ton’s official bond. By this action appellant sought to recover judgment against respondents for damages in the amount of $225.96, together with interest thereon at 6% from December 21, 1959, allegedly resulting from a breach by Mr. Layton of the duties of his office.

Appellant’s complaint alleges inter alia that on November 13, 1958, appellant filed an action in the justice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. JI Case Company v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hattabaugh v. VollmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Jesse Et Ux. v. Birchell Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Woodmansee & Webster Co. v. WoodmanseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Flagg v. PuterbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. GibbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sweitzer v. DeanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. HouselIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API