Legal Opinion
LaFreniere v. Gallinas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff in this action asked for an injunction against the defendants to restrain them from trespassing on his land, and damages. The defendants filed an answer which in effect amounts to a general denial of the allegations that *662the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the land in dispute and the defendants had committed a trespass. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff by his assignments of error sought, in effect, to substitute his draft finding for the major portion of the finding filed by the court, despite the criticism of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Eastern Sportswear Co. v. S. Augstein & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Barrs v. ZukowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Osuch v. OsuchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Velsmid v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- More v. UrbanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Fogg v. WakeleeConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'n, No. Cv 91 0047677 S (Jan. 30, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992