Legal Opinion
More v. Urbano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 18, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to compel the defendant by mandatory injunction to remove a retaining wall and a portion of a build ing from the land, in dispute at the northeast corner of a lot situated on the north side of Hall Avenue in Wallingford. She also sought an injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on her land. The plaintiff acquired this lot by quitclaim deed from her mother on July 18, 1952. The deed gave the dimensions of the lot as 63 feet, more or less, for the front and rear lines, and 155 feet, more or less, for the side lines. The defendant owns two lots,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roy v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Barrs v. ZukowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Dawson v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Radican v. HughesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Waterbury Clock Co. v. IrionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Attorney General v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSBMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.