Legal Opinion
Brown v. Luddy
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1932No. Docket No. 4440PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMSTOCK, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to a quartz mining claim known as the “Never Sweat Quartz Mine” in Calaveras County. Defendants answered and also filed a cross-complaint to quiet title to certain lands patented to the defendant Buddy by the United States government as a stock-raising homestead.
The mining claim was located on the public domain in 1896 by plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest. All requirements of the law in respect to the location of quartz mining claims were fulfilled and the annual assessment work has all been performed. No patent has 'been…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dredge Corp. v. Husite Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Hunt v. PlavsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. Buellton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Dalton v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.