Wilson v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
The trial court granted the defendant City of Tucson’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the City was not liable for an allegedly negligent failure of two of its policemen to arrest a driver whose subsequent acts caused the death of plaintiff’s decedent. The issue before us is whether the trial court properly so ruled.
Before stating the fact's, a preliminary explanation as to what we might call the “factual posture” of the case is in order. .It is, of course, a well-regarded rule that summary judgment is generally not appropriate in negligence cases. See Boozer v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Boozer v. Arizona Country ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dent v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Central Alarm of Tucson v. GanemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- City of Scottsdale v. KokaskaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Acuna v. KroackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Estate of Aten v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.