Legal Opinion
Cano v. Tyrrell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1967No. Civ. 863PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendants and Cross-Complainants appeal from a decree ordering specific performance of an agreement for the exchange of real property between plaintiffs Favian Cano and Bonnie L. Cano, his wife, and defendants E. C. Tyrrell and Claire E. Tyrrell, his wife.
At the time the exchange agreement was executed the Canos owned and operated a rest home at 735 4th Street, Woodland, in Yolo County, licensed for six guests. The home consisted of five bedrooms downstairs, three capable of accommodating two guests per room, and an upstairs bedroom occupied by the Canos’ daughter, unsuitable for use as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Veale v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davenport v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Curran v. HastreiterAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- BEHNIWAL v. MixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005