Legal Opinion

Curran v. Hastreiter

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1978No. 3026, 3071PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

Appellant Mary Jane Curran brings this appeal from the superior court’s judgment which granted the claim of Hastreiter and Zantek for specific performance compelling appellant to convey an individual 49 per cent interest in certain commercial real property located in close proximity to the Alyeska Ski Resort in Girdwood, Alaska. 1 The claim of Hastreiter and Zantek was based on an oral agreement. Appellees Hastreiter and Zantek have cross-appealed from the superior court’s failure to award attorney’s fees to them as the prevailing parties. 2

Hastreiter and Zantek, who are…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tallackson Potato Co., Inc. v. MTK Potato Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API