Legal Opinion

Veale v. Piercy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1962No. Civ. 6805PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. *

The mining claims involved in this action for declaratory relief are located upon government land in a rugged area of the San Bernardino Mountains in San Bernardino County. In 1955 plaintiffs-appellants bought “Sentinel,” a lode mining claim, and in the same year filed several adjoining lode claims. In 1956 defendants-respondents filed a number of placer claims in the same general vicinity, several of which overlapped plaintiffs’ prior lode claims. Plaintiffs filed an action for declaratory relief to determine title in the area of conflict. They alleged title and possession in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Iron Silver Mining Co. v. CheesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Reynolds v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. WitzermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Patterson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API