Legal Opinion
Chaney v. Schneider
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 1949No. Civ. 16909PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
The parties to this action became involved in a controversy respecting their rights under the following provision in a lease of real property:
“At the expiration of this lease, Lessor agrees to give Lessee first refusal for an additional term of lease, at rentals and terms to be mutually agreed upon at that time, provided, the said Lessee shall faithfully comply with and perform all of the covenants conditions of this lease, and provided, further, that the Lessee shall give 30 days’ notice to the Lessor before the expiration of said lease, to renew said lease.”
The lease was for five years,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Morrison v. RossignolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Streicher v. HeimburgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horsey v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Imperial Beach v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.