Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Imperial Beach v. Bailey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1980No. Civ. 18844PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENDERSON, J. *

The City of Imperial Beach (City) filed a complaint for declaratory relief requesting a determination whether the city council (Council) could renew or extend a contract it had with Gary and Hazel Bailey doing business as Imperial Beach Concession (Concession). The court granted City’s motion for summary judgment and ruled City could not contract with Concession.

Factual Background

In June 1963, City entered into a contract with Eva Herron for the construction and operation of a concession stand on the municipal pier for the purpose of selling bait, fishing tackle and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. City Council v. McKinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Chaney v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Beaudry v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. American Canyon Fire Protection District v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API