Legal Opinion
Streicher v. Heimburge
California Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9502PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This appeal is controlled by the proper interpretation to be given a renewal provision in a lease of real property. The action is in unlawful detainer. The prayer is for restitution of the premises and for triple rental. The court directed a verdict for restitution of the premises to plaintiff and submitted to the jury the sole issue of damages for the alleged unlawful withholding thereof. Judgment for plaintiff followed. Defendants have appealed.
On the fourteenth day of October, 1920, one Howard leased to defendants and appellants the ground floor and basement of a certain building situated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Simons v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.