Legal Opinion
Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 24, 1993No. 93-1018, 93-1034PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Carroll Touch, Inc. appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois holding that Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc. (EMS) did not infringe claim 24 of U.S. Patent 4,267,443 and that the ’443 patent is invalid. Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Sys., Inc., 24 USPQ2d 1349, 1992 WL 361702 (C.D.Ill.1992) (memorandum opinion). EMS cross appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Carroll Touch on EMS’ counterclaims alleging violations of federal antitrust and state unfair…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Ramos v. Boehringer Manheim Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- (PS) Hanible v. County of Solano Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.