Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Boehringer Manheim Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 16, 1994No. 90-0416 CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
MISHLER, District Judge.
Dr. Pedro Ramos instituted this action against Boehringer Manheim Corporation1 seeking damages resulting from the defendant’s alleged infringement of claims one, *1067three and five of United States Patent No. 4,380,090 (“090 patent”), a patent issued to Dr. Ramos and owned by him throughout the pendency of this action. DePuy denies the validity of the patent and further denies infringement. DePuy also asserts the affirmative defense of prosecution history or file wrapper estoppel. The case was tried to the court. This memorandum contains…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradshaw v. Igloo Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996