Legal Opinion

Walborn v. General Fireproofing Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1947No. 30738PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The Industrial Commission disallowed the plaintiff’s claim for compensation on-two grounds. The first was that the plaintiff did not suffer an injury in the course of and arising out of his employment.

The plaintiff coaatends that the only prerequisite for the recovery of compensation is to show that he was in the zone of his employment when the injury was-received. This is not the law in this state. In numerous decisions this court has. pointed out repeatedly that under the constitutional and statutory law of Ohio such compensation cannot be obtained unless there is an injury in the course of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Industrial Commission v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Highway Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Industrial Commission v. BankesOhio Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Griffin v. Hydra-Matic DivisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sloss v. Case Western Reserve UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API