Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Hydra-Matic Division

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1988No. 87-258PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The sole issue presented for our review is whether the injury sustained by appellee is compensable pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4123. R.C. 4123.01(C) defines “injury,” inter alia, as “* * * any injury, whether caused by external accidental means or accidental in character and result, received in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment.” While appellant concedes that appellee was injured in the course of her employment, it nevertheless contends that the injury did not arise therefrom. In support of this contention, appellant cites Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co. (1983), 6…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Slanina v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ruther v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tamarkin Co. v. WheelerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Feltner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. McAlpine v. McCloudOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Faber v. R.J. Frazier Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API