Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Bankes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1934No. 24238PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The claimant, Clyde Bankes, upon Decemebr 24, 1929, at about three o’clock in the afternoon, was helping to unload freight from a box car of the Scioto Valley Traction Company to the platform of the Columbus Railway, Power & Light Company, by which company the claimant was employed. This loading occurred during the time of duty of the claimant, and was part of his regular employment. At that time, quoting the words of the claimant, the following occurrence took place:

“There were small boxes to be taken down to the storeroom and those boxes were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Industrial Commission v. AhernOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cassell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. ContieOhio Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Highway Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ashbrook v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Horn v. Broadway GarageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API