Globe Indemnity Co. v. Schmitt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Briefly stated, the question for decision is whether The Globe Indemnity Company, hav ing- settled damage claims for which its insured, The John Shillito Company, was deemed liable, may properly maintain an action for indemnity against Alois Schmitt.
It is a well established rule “that a person.who occupies premises, and maintains or controls, for his own convenience, an opening in the adjacent sidewalk, through which he contracts for the delivery of goods, is liable for injuries received by a pedestrian as a result of the negligence of the deliveryman in not properly guarding or in failing to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.