Legal Opinion

Kersey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 10, 2009No. 08-7040PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.

GARLAND, Circuit Judge:

Glenn Kersey, an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), alleges that WMATA’s refusal to promote him was the consequence of discrimination and retaliation, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. WMATA contends that its refusal was the consequence of a binding settlement agreement that had been in place between the parties since 1990. The district court granted summary judgment for WMATA, and we affirm.

I

WMATA hired Kersey as a bus operator in 1979. In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Matthew McGrath v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  2. Carreras v. Sajo, Garcia & PartnersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Geleta v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API