Legal Opinion
Carreras v. Sajo, Garcia & Partners
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 23, 2010No. 08-2068PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In this workplace discrimination and retaliation suit, the district court ruled that plaintiff, Erick Carreras, failed to comply with Puerto Rico’s anti-ferret rule, D.P.R.R. 56(c). On this basis, it deemed as admitted portions of defendant Sajo, García & Partners’ (“SGP”) statement of uncontested facts and granted summary judgment to defendant. Carreras argues on appeal that the district court improperly invoked Local Rule 56 and erred in rejecting his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (“ADA”), and various Puerto Rico…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- D.B. Ex Rel. Elizabeth B. v. EspositoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Griffin v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Vera v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Mancini v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.