Legal Opinion
Matthew McGrath v. Hillary Clinton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 27, 2012No. 10-5043PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Matthew McGrath contends that his supervisor at the Department of State gave him negative performance reviews in retaliation for his opposition to discriminatory conduct, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court granted the Department’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. Because no reasonable juror could conclude that McGrath’s supervisor unlawfully retaliated against him, we affirm.
I
McGrath served as a Foreign Service Officer in the State Department from 1984 until 2004. The events at issue in this case…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Janet Allen v. Jeh JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Harris v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Camille Grosdidier v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Wayne Bridgeforth v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.