Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 23, 2011No. Civil Action 07-01516(CKK)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cornell Herbert (“Herbert”), an African American, commenced this action against his current employer, the Architect of the Capitol (the “AOC”) on August 24, 2007, claiming that he was discriminated and retaliated against in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (the “CAA”), 2 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq. Presently before the Court is the AOC’s [25] Motion for Summary Judgment, wherein the AOC contends principally…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Fennell v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Moran v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.