Legal Opinion

Micro Motion, Inc. v. Exac Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 28, 1990No. C-89-1825 WHOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND OF THE LITIGATION

This is an action for patent infringement involving devices known as nonintrusive Coriolis' mass flowmeters, which measure the mass flow rate of fluids. Plaintiff, Micro Motion, Incorporated (“Micro Motion”), is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in Boulder, Colorado. Since 1977, Micro Motion has manufactured and sold Coriolis mass flowmeters and accessories. Micro Motion is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company. Defendant; Exac Corporation (“Exac”), is a California corporation,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
  2. Nordberg Inc. v. Telsmith, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Colgate Palmolive Co. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. FullView, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. MOORE NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. Standard Register Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API