Legal Opinion
Nordberg Inc. v. Telsmith, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 29, 1995No. 90-C-555PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
This patent infringement case comes before the Court for decision after a three-week court trial. The Court has carefully considered all of the trial testimony and exhibits, the entire pretrial record, the parties’ post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law and the parties’ post-trial briefing. Based on this review, the Court finds the patent claims-in-suit invalid. The Court further finds that, with the exception of two machines, one sold and one not sold, the claims-in-suit are not infringed, either literally or under the doctrine of…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knox v. LanhamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Nordberg, Inc. v. Telsmith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Ergotron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Arrow International, Inc. v. Spire Biomedical, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Mistop, Inc. v. Aerofin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003