Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Evanson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1956PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

It is contended that at the time of the making of the contract the defendants were not the owners of any interest in the land who entered into the contract for the improvement thereof within the meaning of sec. 289.01 (1) (c), Stats., and that, therefore, plaintiff has no valid claim for a mechanic’s lien. Assuming that, as defendants contend, they had no interest in the premises at the time of the making of the contract because it was not in writing, that fact would not be fatal to plaintiff’s claim for a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff was not required to prove what interest the defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willer v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Williams v. LaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Moritz v. SplittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hawley v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Perlick v. Country Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. General Electric Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API