Kirkwood v. Hoxie
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gogebic. (Haire, J.) Bill to remove a cloud from title occasioned by- a mechanic’s lien. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
The complainant purchased the premises in controversy at administrator’s sale, taking the usual .administrator’s deed. The license from the probate court upon which the sale was made directed that the property' be sold “ subject to all incumbrances, by mortgage or otherwise, existing at the time of the death of the -deceased,” John T. Atkinson. The report of sale shows that the complainant bought the property on September 10, 1889, for $25, “subject to all liens and incumbrances.” At this time the defendants claimed to have a lien upon the premises, and the inference from the proof is strong…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Fish v. HowlandNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
- John Spry Lumber Co. v. Sault Savings Bank Loan & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Vail v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Garson v. GreenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re Estate of FraserMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Lamont v. LeFevreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.