Madison v. Octave Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
■ APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiffs recovered judgment in an action involving the title and the right of possession of a forty-acre tract of land in Fresno County. The defendants appeal from the judgment on a record including a bill of exceptions.
The original complaint álleged that on January 1, 1903, the plaintiffs made a valid location of land in controversy as a mineral placer claim; that in February, 1904, other parties, including some of the defendants, attempted to locate the same claim. The plaintiffs, it was alleged, made several attempts to go upon said claim and do the necessary assessment work for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Davis's Administrator v. WeibboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. LuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Nicholls v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Batchelor v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.