Meeker v. Dalton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The action is ejectment to recover possession of a lot of land in the town of Lodi. The complaint is in the form usual in such actions. The answer denies all the allegations of the complaint, and alleges that defendant is the owner of the land sued for and entitled to the possession thereof, and has been such owner and so entitled to possession since the first day of December, 1881, and then, "further answering said complaint, and by way of cross-complaint,” alleges certain facts which show an equitable defense. The plaintiff demurred to all that part of the " answer called a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Morrison v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Hoppough v. . StrubleNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Mills v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Shain v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.