Legal Opinion
MPH Technologies OY v. Apple, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 13, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00271Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY, Case No. 3:24-CV-00271-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 6 v. [ECF No. 1] 7 APPLE INC., 8 Defendant. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff MPH Technologies Oy’s (“MPH”) motion to compel 11 third party VirnetX, Inc. (“VirnetX”) to produce documents responsive to MPH’s subpoena. 12 (ECF Nos. 1, 91.) VirnetX responded, (ECF No. 4), and MPH replied. (ECF No. 10.) For 13 the reasons stated below, the Court grants MPH’s motion to compel. 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 In 2018, MPH filed a lawsuit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Roger B. EmmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- ATS Products, Inc. v. Champion Fiberglass, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.