Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger B. Emmons

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-3244PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

After a jury trial, Kansas farmer Roger Emmons (“Roger”) was found guilty of each of the four drug-related counts in a superseding indictment: one count charging a conspiracy to manufacture marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 846), another asserting possession with intent to distribute marijuana plants (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)) and the other two charging him with maintaining a place for the purpose of manufacturing marijuana plants (21 U.S.C. § 856). One of Roger’s two codefendants, Jack Rivard (“Rivard”), entered a guilty plea before trial, while the other codefendant, Roger’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. United States v. Janus Industries, Doing Business as Acapulco Smoke Shop, and James B. JanusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API