Legal Opinion

ATS Products, Inc. v. Champion Fiberglass, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 14, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-02403-SI (DMR)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON HOPKINS & CARLEY’S MOTION TO QUASH

Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge

On July 2, 2015, third party Hopkins & Carley, a Law Corporation (“Hopkins & Car-ley”) filed a motion to quash the subpoena issued by Plaintiff ATS Products, Inc. (“ATS”) demanding the deposition of John V. Picone III, a Hopkins & Carley attorney. [Docket No. 116.] Plaintiff opposes the motion. [Docket No. 122.] The court finds this motion is appropriate for resolution without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b). For the following reasons, the motion to quash is denied.

I. Background

A. Description of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. Gonzales v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Citizens for Ceres v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Affinity Credit Union v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  2. Appel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  3. Appel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  4. B.L.S. v. Walnut Creek School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Century International Arms Incorporated v. XTech Tactical LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API