State ex rel. Moore v. City of Fairview
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
In this mandamus action, the City of Fairview (the city) appeals from the peremptory writ ordering it to return $13,345.88 that plaintiff-relator (plaintiff) paid “under protest” as a sewer and water connection fee for a residential subdivision. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the court’s refusal to award him attorney fees. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
The relevant facts are undisputed. In June 1997, the city approved plaintiffs application for approval of the preliminary subdivision plan and a related conditional use permit. The approval was subject to several…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Doney v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Griffin Oak Prop. Invest. v. City of Rockaway BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022