Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Moore v. City of Fairview

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 2000No. 9805-03699; CA A106399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

In this mandamus action, the City of Fairview (the city) appeals from the peremptory writ ordering it to return $13,345.88 that plaintiff-relator (plaintiff) paid “under protest” as a sewer and water connection fee for a residential subdivision. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the court’s refusal to award him attorney fees. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

The relevant facts are undisputed. In June 1997, the city approved plaintiffs application for approval of the preliminary subdivision plan and a related conditional use permit. The approval was subject to several…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Doney v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin Oak Prop. Invest. v. City of Rockaway BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API