Doney v. Clatsop County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action for mandamus and other relief arising from the refusal by defendants Clatsop County and its roadmaster (collectively “county”) to issue a road access permit to plaintiffs pursuant to ORS 374.305 et seq. The trial court entered an ORCP 67 B judgment on the mandamus claim, directing the issuance of a peremptory writ. The county appeals, and we affirm.
Although the facts are stated more extensively by the parties, we recite only those that are necessary to an understanding of our discussion and disposition. Plaintiffs own property in the City of Seaside that they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Campbell v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Yeon Street Partners v. Environmental Consulting ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holman v. City of WarrentonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Johnson v. Landwatch Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Flight Shop, Inc. v. Leading Edge Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Rogue Advocates v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Thomas v. Wasco CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.