Legal Opinion

City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-11-155; CA A50862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff City of Oregon City brought this action for declaratory, injunctive and other relief, seeking to prevent further urban development of and the provision of urban services to the Country Village property, which the private party defendants seek to develop as a phased mobile home park. The city also opposed the development in defendant Clackamas County’s proceedings relating to its design review approval and appealed the county’s approval decision to LUBA. LUBA and, in turn, we affirmed the county’s decision. City of Oregon City v. Clackamas County, 96 Or App 651, 773 P2d 1343, rev den…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Wright v. KECH-TVOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mehring v. ArpkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. City of Oregon City v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. MarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Doney v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Campbell v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Flight Shop, Inc. v. Leading Edge Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Rogue Advocates v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API