Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation and Intervenor Montana State Fund (Responding Insurers), et al., appeal from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC). We affirm.
¶2 The following issues are restated on appeal:
¶3 I. Does the enforcement of Schmill I and Schmill II violate the due process rights of the Responding Insurers?
¶4 II. Does Cassandra Schmill (Schmill) have standing to pursue global common fund benefits and an attorney fees lien on the fund?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶5 This is the third time we have seen this litigation. In Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Schmill v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Ruhd v. Liberty Northwest Insurance CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weidow v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Keller v. Liberty Northwest, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- Stewart v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Keller v. Liberty NWMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Weidow v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2010