Legal Opinion

Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1994No. 94-018PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Appellant Brand E. Caekaert filed a petition in the Workers’ Compensation Court for the State of Montana in which he sought medical and disability benefits from the State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund (State Fund). The Workers’ Compensation Court denied Caekaert’s petition. He appeals that decision. We reverse the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court.

The following issues are presented on appeal:

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err when it denied Caekaert’s claim for medical expenses?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err when it denied Caekaert’s claim for temporary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. LaChance v. McKownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Belton v. Carlson TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rowland v. KliesMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McIntyre v. Glen Lake Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zempel v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Turjan v. Valley View EstatesMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wilson v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API