Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Haas
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2012No. D058225PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
In this pension case the City of San Diego (the City) obtained by summary judgment against defendants San Diego City Employees Retirement System (SDCERS), Richard Haas and Benjamin Vernon (together sometimes defendants), a judicial declaration that defendants are ineligible to receive certain “ancillary” retirement benefits. The ancillary benefits at issue on this appeal are (1) a “13th retirement check,” payable whenever there are “excess earnings” available in the retirement system at the end of the year; (2) the “Deferred Retirement Option Program” (DROP), an alternative…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- JMR Construction Corp. v. Environmental Assessment & Remediation Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Cal Fire Local 2881 v. California Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hott v. College of the Sequoias Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.