Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Hart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit, for a bank balance. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

Appellee sued appellants, A. J. Howe and Gustav A. Bodenschatz, as copartners, doing business as Arnold Bros., Baker & Co., the declaration being the common counts. Service was had only upon appellants, who pleaded non-assumpsit and non-joint liability, and verified both pleas. A trial before the Circuit Court and a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment against appellants for $1,164.48, from which this appeal is taken. It is claimed by appellants, first, that there was error in the rulings of the trial court in admitting and rejecting evidence; second, that the evidence is not sufficient to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. West Chicago Street Railway Co. v. FishmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Meyer v. KrohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Page v. BrantIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  5. George D. Putnam & Co. v. French & MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. PucherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Arnold v. GehringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  3. Level v. ChadbourneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Arnold v. BurgdorfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  5. Arnold v. EgerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API