Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Gehring

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for money deposited in a bank. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Verdiet and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

' This was an action of assumpsit by appellee against appellants. The appellants, Adolph Arnold, Herman Arnold and Theodore Arnold, filed jointly a plea of nonassumpsit, and also, jointly, a plea of non-joint liability, verified. Benjamin F. Baker, appellant, filed like pleas. The pleas of non-joint liability are not abstracted.

The appellants’ counsel object that the plaintiff (appellee here) failed to prove partnership or joint liability of the defendants. The proof was that Adolph Arnold, Hermon Arnold, Theodore Arnold, Benjamin…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibler v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Dickinson v. GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. Arnold v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Love v. DickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API