Arnold v. Burgdorf
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, for money had, etc. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
The general facts of this case are like those in Arnold v. Hart, 75 Ill. App. 165, and same case, 176 Ill. 442, where they may be seen. In this case, as in that one, the suit is by a depositor in the savings department of the banking business conducted by the appellants and Howe and Bodenschatz, as partners, originally, and by Howe and Bodenschatz as successors to the original partnership.
The pivotal question is whether appellee had notice of the dissolution of the original partnership, and the withdrawal by appellants from the firm, prior to or at the time of making a part of the deposits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arnold v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Arnold v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Arnold v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898