Meyer v. Krohn
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—■ heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. John H. Williams, Judge, presiding.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—■ heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. John H. Williams, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Moses Krohn and Leopold Feiss, partners, under the firm name of Krohn, Feiss & Co., against John Meyer and Moses Bachrach, together with Solomon Hoffheimer and Eva Hoffheimer, as partners, doing business at Galesburg, Illinois, under the firm-name of Hoffheimer & Co. The declaration contains six special counts on as many bills of exchange accepted by Hoffheimer & Co., and also…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mulkey
Moses Krohn and Leopold Feiss, wholesale merchants at Cincinnati, Ohio, doing business as partners, under the firm name of Krohn, Feiss & Co., brought to the June term, 1883, of the Adams county circuit court, an action of assumpsit, against John Meyer, Moses Bachrach, Solomon Hoffheimer and Eva Hoffheimer, as partners, lately doing business at Galesburg, Illinois, under the name and style of Hoffheimer & Co. The declaration was in the usual form, containing the common counts and six special counts, on bills of exchange payable to appellees, and drawn by them upon and accepted by Hoffheimer &…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Bickerdike v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Haj v. American Bottle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. MarpleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rector v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Young v. ClappIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.