Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Pucher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit.—Common counts. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

Questions arising on this appeal are, for the most part, settled by the decision in Arnold v. Hart, 75 Ill. App. 165, affirmed in 176 Ill. 442.

It is, however, urged that, conceding the propriety of the verdict and judgment as to the amount of the deposits made before the change in the copartnership, yet as to the $200 deposited thereafter, the verdict was improper, because it appeared that appellee had no acquaintance with or knowledge of Baker, one' of the old firm, at any time during the making of the different deposits. Hence, it is argued, he could not have continued his relationship as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. VerstenIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. West Chicago Street Railroad v. DoughertyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Phenix Insurance v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. West Chicago Street Railroad v. EstepIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Arnold v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Chicago St. R. R. v. DudgeonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Arnold v. PfaffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API