Legal Opinion
Holdmeyer v. Veneman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2004No. 3:02CV1978 (PCD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, Defendant moves for summary judgment on all counts. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND: 1
Plaintiffs, pro se, complaint states that his cause of action is “[ejmployer liability for harassment by supervisors based on sex, race, color, and national origin.” Compl. at 3. In an attachment to his complaint, Plaintiff also states that he was discriminated on the basis of his marital status. Plaintiff is a married, white, American male. In his complaint, Plaintiff details…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pinder v. Employment Development DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Cordaro v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Furfero v. St. John's UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Gissendanner v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Reynolds v. MayorkasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.