Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 8, 2009No. 26667-2-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
fl Camp Automotive, Inc., d/b/a Camp Chevrolet Cadillac, an entity owned by Lithia Motors, Inc. (collectively Camp) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment grant to Marcia and Theron Johnson on their claim that Camp violated both RCW 82.04.500 and Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, by charging a business and occupation (B&O) tax on top of the negotiated, final vehicle price. A Washington car dealer may not charge a purchaser a B&O tax on top of the negotiated, final price of a vehicle. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc., 160 Wn.2d 173, 178, 157 P.3d 847 (2007).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steele v. Extendicare Health Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Jared Peck v. At&t MobilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Peck v. AT&T MobilityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Peck v. AT&T MobilityWashington Supreme Court · 2012