Legal Opinion

Peck v. AT&T Mobility

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2012No. 85581-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 This certified question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals centers on whether under RCW 82.04.500, a seller may, upon disclosure, recoup its business and occupation (B&O) tax by collecting a surcharge to recover gross receipts taxes in addition to its monthly service fee. We hold that, regardless of disclosure, RCW 82.04.500 prevents a business from recouping the B&O tax as an added charge to its sales price.

FACTS

¶2 James Bowden purchased three cellular telephones and a monthly cellular service plan for each telephone at a Cingular kiosk. As part of the purchase process, he signed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API