Peck v. AT&T Mobility
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.
¶1 This certified question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals centers on whether under RCW 82.04.500, a seller may, upon disclosure, recoup its business and occupation (B&O) tax by collecting a surcharge to recover gross receipts taxes in addition to its monthly service fee. We hold that, regardless of disclosure, RCW 82.04.500 prevents a business from recouping the B&O tax as an added charge to its sales price.
FACTS
¶2 James Bowden purchased three cellular telephones and a monthly cellular service plan for each telephone at a Cingular kiosk. As part of the purchase process, he signed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Johnson v. Camp Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012